BASV vs MFSV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs MFS Active Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or MFSV?
Each has led over a different period.
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. BASV led over the full window, MFSV over 1Y. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | MFSV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.44%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $618M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 1.41% |
| Holdings | 42 | 64 |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +9.21%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +12.64%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 9.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -6.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,949Best | $11,858 |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7% | 32.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | MFS Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Dec 5, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASV vs MFSV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASV vs MFSV Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and MFS Active Value ETF (MFSV) is an ETF from MFS Investment Management. Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% while MFSV returned +12.64%. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a gain of 9.21% for MFSV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 9.8% for MFSV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -6.3% for MFSV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while MFSV charges 0.44%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $44 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 1.41% for MFSV.
Holdings Overlap
24.3% of BASV's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 19.5% of MFSV's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
BASV and MFSV share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 60 in MFSV, against full books of 42 and 64.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 50 positions for MFSV that do not appear in our book for BASV (77.9% of the fund), and 27 for BASV that do not appear in MFSV (61.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BASV | Weight in MFSV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.27% | 5.28% | 1.01% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.68% | 5.35% | 1.67% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.90% | 2.25% | 0.65% |
| CRH:LNCrh Plc - Common | 2.67% | 0.78% | 1.89% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 2.10% | 1.31% | 0.79% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 2.48% | 0.79% | 1.69% |
| HONAHoneywell Aerospace Inc | 2.48% | 0.36% | 2.12% |
| MDLZMondelez International Inc Com A Npv | 1.79% | 0.98% | 0.81% |
| KKRKkr & Co. Inc. Class a | 1.03% | 1.59% | 0.56% |
| HONHoneywell International Inc | 0.94% | 0.85% | 0.09% |
24.3% of BASV is already inside MFSV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or MFSV?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while MFSV charges 0.44%. MFSV is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASV or MFSV?
Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% vs +12.64% for MFSV, so MFSV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +14.68% vs +14.01% for MFSV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASV or MFSV?
BASV has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 9.8% for MFSV. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs MFSV -6.3%.
Should I hold both BASV and MFSV?
BASV and MFSV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and MFSV?
24.3% of BASV's money is in holdings MFSV also owns. 19.5% of MFSV's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 60 in MFSV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or MFSV?
BASV yields 0.38% while MFSV yields 1.41%, so MFSV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is MFSV better than BASV?
MFSV has a lower expense ratio. BASV led over the full window, MFSV over 1Y. MFSV is less concentrated, with 32.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.