BASV vs PJFV
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF vs PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
Which is better, BASV or PJFV?
PJFV has been ahead.
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y and the full window. BASV is less concentrated, with 34.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BASV | PJFV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.71% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $413M | $183M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.38% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 42 | 37 |
| YTD Return | +7.52% | +20.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.61% | +27.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.7% | 10.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -9.4% | -7.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $11,949 | $14,025Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.7%Best | 41.1% |
| Fund Family | Brown Advisory | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 13, 2025 | Dec 12, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
BASV vs PJFV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
BASV vs PJFV Performance
Brown Advisory Sustainable Value ETF (BASV) is an ETF from Brown Advisory and PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% while PJFV returned +27.75%. Year to date, BASV is up 7.52% versus a gain of 20.68% for PJFV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BASV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.7% compared with 10.1% for PJFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.4% for BASV and -7.3% for PJFV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BASV charges 0.71% per year while PJFV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $33 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BASV currently yields 0.38% against 0.57% for PJFV.
Holdings Overlap
14.3% of BASV's money is in holdings PJFV also owns. 15.9% of PJFV's money is in holdings BASV also owns.
PJFV and BASV share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 35 in PJFV, against full books of 42 and 37.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 27 positions for PJFV that do not appear in our book for BASV (73.0% of the fund), and 32 for BASV that do not appear in PJFV (68.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BASV and PJFV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BASV or PJFV?
BASV has an expense ratio of 0.71% while PJFV charges 0.33%. PJFV is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BASV or PJFV?
Over the past year BASV returned +11.61% vs +27.75% for PJFV, so PJFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BASV annualized +14.68% vs +29.72% for PJFV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BASV or PJFV?
BASV has been the more volatile fund at 10.7% annualized versus 10.1% for PJFV. Worst drawdown: BASV -9.4% vs PJFV -7.3%.
Should I hold both BASV and PJFV?
BASV and PJFV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BASV and PJFV?
15.9% of PJFV's money is in holdings BASV also owns. 15.9% of PJFV's is in holdings BASV also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BASV and 35 in PJFV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BASV or PJFV?
BASV yields 0.38% while PJFV yields 0.57%, so PJFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJFV better than BASV?
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y and the full window. BASV is less concentrated, with 34.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.