BATT vs VTI
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BATT or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BATT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $113M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 55 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +1.13% | +14.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | +7.97% | +17.97%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.08% | +22.47%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.20% | +12.62%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 30.6% | 17.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.4% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,947 | $18,117Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Amplify ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 6, 2018 to Oct 13, 2026 (8.4 years).
BATT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.4 years both funds cover.
BATT vs VTI Performance
Amplify Lithium & Battery Technology ETF (BATT) is an ETF from Amplify ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BATT returned +7.97% while VTI returned +17.97%. Year to date, BATT is up 1.13% versus a gain of 14.35% for VTI.
Over three years, BATT compounded at +11.08% per year against +22.47% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -2.20% and +12.62% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs -2.35%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BATT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.4% for BATT and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BATT charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BATT currently yields 1.61% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
24.4% of BATT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's money is in holdings BATT also owns.
BATT and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, BATT as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
7 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in BATT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 55 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,143 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BATT (96.0% of the fund), and 3 for BATT that do not appear in VTI (2.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
24.4% of BATT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BATT or VTI?
BATT has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BATT or VTI?
Over the past year BATT returned +7.97% vs +17.97% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BATT annualized -2.35% vs +13.47% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BATT or VTI?
BATT has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BATT -69.4% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both BATT and VTI?
BATT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BATT and VTI?
24.4% of BATT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.5% of VTI's is in holdings BATT also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 52 positions we hold weights for in BATT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BATT or VTI?
BATT yields 1.61% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BATT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BATT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.