BAVA vs SPY

BAVA vs SPY

Which is better, BAVA or SPY?

We do not have enough on BAVA and SPY to separate them.

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBAVASPY
Expense Ratio-0.09%
AUM$27M$823.2B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.99%
Holdings11,515
YTD Return+5.72%+13.53%Best
1Y Return-+17.47%
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.36%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.21%
Fund FamilyBitwiseState Street Investment Management
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleSingle CurrencyLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 15, 2026Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BAVA vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

BAVA vs SPY Performance

Bitwise Avalanche ETF (BAVA) is an ETF from Bitwise and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, BAVA is up 5.72% versus a gain of 13.53% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BAVA and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BAVASPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which pays a higher dividend, BAVA or SPY?

BAVA yields 0.00% while SPY yields 0.99%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than BAVA?

We hold very little data on BAVA and SPY, so there is not enough here to separate them. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.