BBAX vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBAX or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBAX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6.6B | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.82% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 102 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.08% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.82% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.45% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.96% | +11.99%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.3% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.6% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,357 | $17,616Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.6% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 8, 2018 to Oct 14, 2026 (8.2 years).
BBAX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 8.2 years both funds cover.
BBAX vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBAX returned +11.82% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, BBAX is up 8.08% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, BBAX compounded at +14.45% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.96% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.26% annualized vs +5.22%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBAX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.3% compared with 17.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.6% for BBAX and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBAX charges 0.19% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $3 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBAX currently yields 3.82% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
3.3% of BBAX's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
BBAX and VTI share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 91 positions we hold weights for in BBAX and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 102 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,155 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BBAX (97.6% of the fund), and 0 for BBAX that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBAX and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBAX or VTI?
BBAX has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBAX or VTI?
Over the past year BBAX returned +11.82% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBAX annualized +5.22% vs +13.26% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBAX or VTI?
BBAX has been the more volatile fund at 18.3% annualized versus 17.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBAX -39.6% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both BBAX and VTI?
BBAX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBAX and VTI?
3.3% of BBAX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings BBAX also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 91 positions we hold weights for in BBAX and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBAX or VTI?
BBAX yields 3.82% while VTI yields 1.06%, so BBAX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBAX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.