BBHL vs CGCV

BBHL vs CGCV

Which is better, BBHL or CGCV?

BBHL has been ahead.

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. BBHL led over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.3%.

Lower Fees: CGCVHigher Returns (1Y): BBHLLess Concentrated: CGCV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBBHLCGCV
Expense Ratio0.71%0.33%Best
AUM$540M$2.1B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.59%
Holdings98146
YTD Return+9.09%Best+8.70%
1Y Return+11.66%Best+11.37%
Top 10 Weight47.3%33.0%Best
Fund FamilyBrown Brothers HarrimanCapital Group (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 17, 2025Jun 25, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

BBHL vs CGCV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BBHL against instead:BBHL vs SPYBBHL vs QQQBBHL vs VOOBBHL vs VTICGCV against:CGCV vs VXUS

BBHL vs CGCV Performance

BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL) is an ETF from Brown Brothers Harriman and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year BBHL returned +11.66% while CGCV returned +11.37%. Year to date, BBHL is up 9.09% versus a gain of 8.70% for CGCV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BBHL charges 0.71% per year while CGCV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $71 vs $33 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBHL currently yields 0.00% against 1.59% for CGCV.

Holdings Overlap

BBHL already in CGCV53.3%
CGCV already in BBHL39.4%

53.3% of BBHL's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 39.4% of CGCV's money is in holdings BBHL also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

22 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in BBHL and 73 in CGCV, against full books of 98 and 146.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 47 positions for CGCV that do not appear in our book for BBHL (55.4% of the fund), and 25 for BBHL that do not appear in CGCV (43.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BBHLWeight in CGCVDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp8.15%6.20%1.95%
AAPLApple, Inc5.76%3.07%2.69%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.71%4.04%2.33%
LLYEli Lilly & Co.2.72%3.00%0.28%
NVDANvidia Corp3.18%2.16%1.02%
MAMastercard Inc3.92%0.88%3.04%
KLACKla-tencor4.06%0.54%3.52%
LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares3.05%1.51%1.54%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.81%2.72%0.91%
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.3.01%1.45%1.56%

53.3% of BBHL is already inside CGCV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BBHLCGCV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BBHL or CGCV?

BBHL has an expense ratio of 0.71% while CGCV charges 0.33%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BBHL or CGCV?

Over the past year BBHL returned +11.66% vs +11.37% for CGCV, so BBHL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BBHL and CGCV?

53.3% of BBHL's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 39.4% of CGCV's is in holdings BBHL also owns. They hold 22 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in BBHL and 73 in CGCV.

Which pays a higher dividend, BBHL or CGCV?

BBHL yields 0.00% while CGCV yields 1.59%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is CGCV better than BBHL?

CGCV has a lower expense ratio. BBHL led over 1Y. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.