BBHM vs FMTM
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF vs MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF
Which is better, BBHM or FMTM?
FMTM has been ahead.
FMTM has a lower expense ratio. FMTM led over 1Y. FMTM is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBHM | FMTM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.81% | 0.45%Best |
| AUM | $381M | $284M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.24% |
| Holdings | 60 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +1.68% | +19.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.49% | +33.28%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.9% | 34.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Brothers Harriman | MarketDesk Indices |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | Mar 20, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BBHM vs FMTM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBHM vs FMTM Performance
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) is an ETF from Brown Brothers Harriman and MarketDesk Focused US Momentum ETF (FMTM) is an ETF from MarketDesk Indices. Over the past year BBHM returned +5.49% while FMTM returned +33.28%. Year to date, BBHM is up 1.68% versus a gain of 19.82% for FMTM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBHM charges 0.81% per year while FMTM charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $81 vs $45 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBHM currently yields 0.00% against 0.24% for FMTM.
Holdings Overlap
6.2% of BBHM's money is in holdings FMTM also owns. 6.7% of FMTM's money is in holdings BBHM also owns.
FMTM and BBHM share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BBHM and 31 in FMTM, against full books of 60 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 29 positions for FMTM that do not appear in our book for BBHM (93.4% of the fund), and 26 for BBHM that do not appear in FMTM (89.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBHM and FMTM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBHM or FMTM?
BBHM has an expense ratio of 0.81% while FMTM charges 0.45%. FMTM is the cheaper option, by $36 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBHM or FMTM?
Over the past year BBHM returned +5.49% vs +33.28% for FMTM, so FMTM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBHM and FMTM?
6.7% of FMTM's money is in holdings BBHM also owns. 6.7% of FMTM's is in holdings BBHM also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BBHM and 31 in FMTM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBHM or FMTM?
BBHM yields 0.00% while FMTM yields 0.24%, so FMTM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FMTM better than BBHM?
FMTM has a lower expense ratio. FMTM led over 1Y. FMTM is less concentrated, with 34.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.