BBHM vs LOWV
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF vs AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF
Which is better, BBHM or LOWV?
LOWV has been ahead.
LOWV has a lower expense ratio. LOWV led over 1Y. LOWV is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBHM | LOWV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.81% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $381M | $206M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.87% |
| Holdings | 60 | 71 |
| YTD Return | +1.68% | +8.98%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.49% | +9.29%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.12% |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.9% | 42.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Brown Brothers Harriman | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Blend | Mid Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 17, 2025 | Mar 22, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BBHM vs LOWV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BBHM vs LOWV Performance
BBH Select Mid Cap ETF (BBHM) is an ETF from Brown Brothers Harriman and AB US Low Volatility Equity ETF (LOWV) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year BBHM returned +5.49% while LOWV returned +9.29%. Year to date, BBHM is up 1.68% versus a gain of 8.98% for LOWV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBHM charges 0.81% per year while LOWV charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $81 vs $39 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBHM currently yields 0.00% against 0.87% for LOWV.
Holdings Overlap
4.8% of BBHM's money is in holdings LOWV also owns. 1.2% of LOWV's money is in holdings BBHM also owns.
BBHM and LOWV share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BBHM and 68 in LOWV, against full books of 60 and 71.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 60 positions for LOWV that do not appear in our book for BBHM (91.5% of the fund), and 27 for BBHM that do not appear in LOWV (90.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBHM | Weight in LOWV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KEYSKeysight Technologies Inc. | 4.76% | 1.22% | 3.54% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBHM and LOWV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBHM or LOWV?
BBHM has an expense ratio of 0.81% while LOWV charges 0.39%. LOWV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBHM or LOWV?
Over the past year BBHM returned +5.49% vs +9.29% for LOWV, so LOWV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBHM and LOWV?
4.8% of BBHM's money is in holdings LOWV also owns. 1.2% of LOWV's is in holdings BBHM also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in BBHM and 68 in LOWV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBHM or LOWV?
BBHM yields 0.00% while LOWV yields 0.87%, so LOWV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LOWV better than BBHM?
LOWV has a lower expense ratio. LOWV led over 1Y. LOWV is less concentrated, with 42.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.