BCD vs BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
Which is better, BCD or BCI?
Nearly the same fund. BCI costs less.
BCI has a lower expense ratio. BCD led over 5Y and the full window, BCI over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCD | BCI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.26%Best |
| AUM | $450M | $3.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 13.87% | 12.50% |
| Holdings | 41 | 16 |
| YTD Return | +26.64% | +34.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +32.63% | +41.70%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.45% | +15.91%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.69%Best | +10.30% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9%Best | 14.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8%Best | -32.7% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,617Best | $16,326 |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Aberdeen |
| Category | Commodity | Commodity |
| Style | Commodities | Commodities |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Mar 30, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 31, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.5 years).
BCD vs BCI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.5 years both funds cover.
BCD vs BCI Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is an ETF from Aberdeen and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is an ETF from Aberdeen. Over the past year BCD returned +32.63% while BCI returned +41.70%. Year to date, BCD is up 26.64% versus a gain of 34.71% for BCI.
Over three years, BCD compounded at +14.45% per year against +15.91% for BCI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.69% and +10.30% respectively. Across the full 10-year window we track, BCD has the edge at +9.52% annualized vs +7.89%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 12.9% for BCD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for BCD and -32.7% for BCI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCD charges 0.30% per year while BCI charges 0.26%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $26 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCD currently yields 13.87% against 12.50% for BCI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in BCD and 2 in BCI, totalling 40.4% and 93.0% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in BCD and 2 in BCI, against full books of 41 and 16.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCD | Weight in BCI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GVMXXSsi Us Gov Money Market Class | 40.43% | 68.80% | 28.37% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCD and BCI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCD or BCI?
BCD has an expense ratio of 0.30% while BCI charges 0.26%. BCI is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BCD or BCI?
Over the past year BCD returned +32.63% vs +41.70% for BCI, so BCI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (10 years), BCD annualized +9.52% vs +7.89% for BCI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BCD or BCI?
BCI has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 12.9% for BCD. Worst drawdown: BCD -29.8% vs BCI -32.7%.
Should I hold both BCD and BCI?
BCD and BCI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCD or BCI?
BCD yields 13.87% while BCI yields 12.50%, so BCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BCI better than BCD?
BCI has a lower expense ratio. BCD led over 5Y and the full window, BCI over 1Y and 3Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.