BCFN vs GTEK
Baron Financials ETF vs Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF
Which is better, BCFN or GTEK?
GTEK has been ahead.
GTEK has a lower expense ratio. GTEK led over 1Y. GTEK is less concentrated, with 32.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCFN | GTEK |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.75%Best |
| AUM | - | $244M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 84 | 122 |
| YTD Return | -10.79% | +38.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +43.93% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +33.08% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.36% |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.4% | 32.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Goldman Sachs Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Sep 14, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCFN vs GTEK growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCFN vs GTEK Performance
Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Goldman Sachs Future Tech Leaders Equity ETF (GTEK) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Year to date, BCFN is down 10.79% versus a gain of 38.51% for GTEK.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCFN charges 0.80% per year while GTEK charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $75 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCFN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for GTEK.
Holdings Overlap
2.1% of BCFN's money is in holdings GTEK also owns. 1.7% of GTEK's money is in holdings BCFN also owns.
BCFN and GTEK share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BCFN and 60 in GTEK, against full books of 84 and 122.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 27 positions for GTEK that do not appear in our book for BCFN (45.2% of the fund), and 35 for BCFN that do not appear in GTEK (89.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCFN and GTEK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCFN or GTEK?
BCFN has an expense ratio of 0.80% while GTEK charges 0.75%. GTEK is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCFN and GTEK?
2.1% of BCFN's money is in holdings GTEK also owns. 1.7% of GTEK's is in holdings BCFN also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BCFN and 60 in GTEK.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCFN or GTEK?
BCFN yields 0.00% while GTEK yields 0.00%, so GTEK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GTEK better than BCFN?
GTEK has a lower expense ratio. GTEK led over 1Y. GTEK is less concentrated, with 32.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.