BCFN vs GUNR
Baron Financials ETF vs Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF
Which is better, BCFN or GUNR?
GUNR has been ahead.
GUNR has a lower expense ratio. GUNR led over 1Y. GUNR is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCFN | GUNR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.46%Best |
| AUM | - | $7.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.34% |
| Holdings | 84 | 177 |
| YTD Return | -10.79% | +18.20%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +10.26% |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.4% | 37.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Northern Trust Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Sep 16, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCFN vs GUNR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCFN vs GUNR Performance
Baron Financials ETF (BCFN) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Northern Trust Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources ETF (GUNR) is an ETF from Northern Trust Asset Management. Year to date, BCFN is down 10.79% versus a gain of 18.20% for GUNR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCFN charges 0.80% per year while GUNR charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $46 annually, a gap of $34 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCFN currently yields 0.00% against 2.34% for GUNR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 40 holdings in BCFN and 129 in GUNR, totalling 98.7% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BCFN and 129 in GUNR, against full books of 84 and 177.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 33 positions for GUNR that do not appear in our book for BCFN (36.3% of the fund), and 36 for BCFN that do not appear in GUNR (89.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCFN and GUNR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCFN or GUNR?
BCFN has an expense ratio of 0.80% while GUNR charges 0.46%. GUNR is the cheaper option, by $34 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCFN or GUNR?
BCFN yields 0.00% while GUNR yields 2.34%, so GUNR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GUNR better than BCFN?
GUNR has a lower expense ratio. GUNR led over 1Y. GUNR is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.