BCGS vs QQQ
Bancreek Global Select ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BCGS or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.80% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $39M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 102 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +2.02% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.7%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Bancreek Capital Advisors | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 9, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCGS vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCGS vs QQQ Performance
Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BCGS is up 2.02% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCGS charges 0.80% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $80 vs $18 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCGS currently yields 0.48% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
15.4% of BCGS's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 17.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings BCGS also owns.
QQQ and BCGS share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 102 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 85 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BCGS (78.7% of the fund), and 23 for BCGS that do not appear in QQQ (44.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCGS | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 2.18% | 8.33% | 6.15% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.15% | 3.26% | 1.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.03% | 2.53% | 0.50% |
| STXSeagate Technolo | 2.07% | 0.87% | 1.20% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 1.64% | 1.21% | 0.43% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 1.91% | 0.68% | 1.23% |
| CTASCintas Corp. | 1.89% | 0.33% | 1.56% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 1.58% | 0.37% | 1.21% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCGS and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCGS or QQQ?
BCGS has an expense ratio of 0.80% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCGS and QQQ?
17.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings BCGS also owns. 17.6% of QQQ's is in holdings BCGS also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in BCGS and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCGS or QQQ?
BCGS yields 0.48% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BCGS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BCGS?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BCGS is less concentrated, with 22.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.