BCHI vs GAIQ
GMO Beyond China ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Global Innovators Fund ETF
Which is better, BCHI or GAIQ?
BCHI costs less.
BCHI has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCHI | GAIQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $13M | $657,287.68 |
| Dividend Yield | 21.46% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 100 | 30 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 37.1%Best |
| Fund Family | GMO | Guinness Atkinson Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Aug 12, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 61 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BCHI has data through Aug 14, 2026 and GAIQ through Oct 14, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCHI charges 0.65% per year while GAIQ charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $79 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCHI currently yields 21.46% against 0.00% for GAIQ.
Holdings Overlap
11.6% of BCHI's money is in holdings GAIQ also owns. 3.4% of GAIQ's money is in holdings BCHI also owns.
BCHI and GAIQ share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 62 days apart, BCHI as of Jun 30, 2026 and GAIQ as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in BCHI and 31 in GAIQ, against full books of 100 and 30.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for GAIQ that do not appear in our book for BCHI (77.6% of the fund), and 4 for BCHI that do not appear in GAIQ (2.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCHI | Weight in GAIQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 11.60% | 3.36% | 8.24% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCHI and GAIQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCHI or GAIQ?
BCHI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while GAIQ charges 0.79%. BCHI is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCHI and GAIQ?
11.6% of BCHI's money is in holdings GAIQ also owns. 3.4% of GAIQ's is in holdings BCHI also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in BCHI and 31 in GAIQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCHI or GAIQ?
BCHI yields 21.46% while GAIQ yields 0.00%, so BCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GAIQ better than BCHI?
BCHI has a lower expense ratio. GAIQ is less concentrated, with 37.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.