BCHI vs RGLO
GMO Beyond China ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Which is better, BCHI or RGLO?
BCHI has been ahead.
RGLO has a lower expense ratio. BCHI led over 1Y and the full window. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCHI | RGLO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.49%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $368M |
| Dividend Yield | 21.46% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 100 | 384 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 10.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.0% | -9.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $14,594Best | $13,399 |
| Top 10 Weight | 47.8% | 26.2%Best |
| Fund Family | GMO | Russell Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | May 29, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 61 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BCHI has data through Aug 14, 2026 and RGLO through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 30, 2025 to Aug 14, 2026 (1.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCHI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 10.3% for RGLO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.0% for BCHI and -9.6% for RGLO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCHI charges 0.65% per year while RGLO charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $49 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCHI currently yields 21.46% against 0.57% for RGLO.
Holdings Overlap
24.8% of BCHI's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 2.3% of RGLO's money is in holdings BCHI also owns.
BCHI and RGLO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 78 days apart, BCHI as of Jun 30, 2026 and RGLO as of Sep 16, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in BCHI and 346 in RGLO, against full books of 100 and 384.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 110 positions for RGLO that do not appear in our book for BCHI (51.8% of the fund), and 4 for BCHI that do not appear in RGLO (2.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCHI | Weight in RGLO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 11.60% | 1.44% | 10.16% |
| 005930:KRSamsung Electronics Ltd. | 11.10% | 0.58% | 10.52% |
| KBANK.N:THKasikornbank Pcl Nvdr THB10.0 | 1.90% | 0.22% | 1.68% |
| BBNI:IDBank Negara Indonesia Persero Tbk Pt | 0.20% | 0.09% | 0.11% |
24.8% of BCHI is already inside RGLO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCHI or RGLO?
BCHI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while RGLO charges 0.49%. RGLO is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BCHI or RGLO?
BCHI has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 10.3% for RGLO. Worst drawdown: BCHI -16.0% vs RGLO -9.6%.
Should I hold both BCHI and RGLO?
BCHI and RGLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BCHI and RGLO?
24.8% of BCHI's money is in holdings RGLO also owns. 2.3% of RGLO's is in holdings BCHI also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in BCHI and 346 in RGLO.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCHI or RGLO?
BCHI yields 21.46% while RGLO yields 0.57%, so BCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RGLO better than BCHI?
RGLO has a lower expense ratio. BCHI led over 1Y and the full window. RGLO is less concentrated, with 26.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 47.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.