BCHI vs THOR
GMO Beyond China ETF vs Thornburg Premium Income Builder ETF
Which is better, BCHI or THOR?
BCHI costs less.
BCHI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCHI | THOR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65%Best | 0.79% |
| AUM | $13M | $38M |
| Dividend Yield | 21.46% | 0.43% |
| Holdings | 100 | 59 |
| Fund Family | GMO | Thornburg Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 12, 2025 | Jun 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 61 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BCHI has data through Aug 14, 2026 and THOR through Oct 14, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCHI charges 0.65% per year while THOR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $79 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCHI currently yields 21.46% against 0.43% for THOR.
Holdings Overlap
At least 11.6% of BCHI's money is in holdings THOR also owns.
Stated as a floor: for THOR, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
BCHI and THOR share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 93 days apart, BCHI as of Jun 30, 2026 and THOR as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in BCHI and 54 in THOR, against full books of 100 and 59.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCHI | Weight in THOR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 11.60% | 2.79% | 8.81% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCHI and THOR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCHI or THOR?
BCHI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while THOR charges 0.79%. BCHI is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BCHI and THOR?
At least 11.6% of BCHI's money is in holdings THOR also owns. Our book for THOR is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in BCHI and 54 in THOR.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCHI or THOR?
BCHI yields 21.46% while THOR yields 0.43%, so BCHI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is THOR better than BCHI?
BCHI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.