BCI vs DCMT
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF
Which is better, BCI or DCMT?
Each has led over a different period.
BCI has a lower expense ratio. BCI led over the full window, DCMT over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCI | DCMT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26%Best | 0.66% |
| AUM | $3.5B | $48M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.50% | 2.56% |
| Holdings | 16 | 12 |
| YTD Return | +34.71% | +46.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | +41.70% | +48.21%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.91% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.30% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3%Best | 16.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8%Best | -16.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $16,471Best | $16,100 |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | DoubleLine Funds |
| Category | Commodity | Commodity |
| Style | Commodities | Commodities |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Jan 31, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
BCI vs DCMT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
BCI vs DCMT Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) is an ETF from Aberdeen and DoubleLine Commodity Strategy ETF (DCMT) is an ETF from DoubleLine Funds. Over the past year BCI returned +41.70% while DCMT returned +48.21%. Year to date, BCI is up 34.71% versus a gain of 46.64% for DCMT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DCMT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.1% compared with 14.3% for BCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BCI and -16.0% for DCMT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCI charges 0.26% per year while DCMT charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $66 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCI currently yields 12.50% against 2.56% for DCMT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 2 holdings in BCI and 3 in DCMT, totalling 93.0% and 4.3% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 2 positions we hold weights for in BCI and 3 in DCMT, against full books of 16 and 12.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCI and DCMT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCI or DCMT?
BCI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while DCMT charges 0.66%. BCI is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BCI or DCMT?
Over the past year BCI returned +41.70% vs +48.21% for DCMT, so DCMT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BCI or DCMT?
DCMT has been the more volatile fund at 16.1% annualized versus 14.3% for BCI. Worst drawdown: BCI -14.8% vs DCMT -16.0%.
Should I hold both BCI and DCMT?
BCI and DCMT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCI or DCMT?
BCI yields 12.50% while DCMT yields 2.56%, so BCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DCMT better than BCI?
BCI has a lower expense ratio. BCI led over the full window, DCMT over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.