BCI vs HCOM
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Which is better, BCI or HCOM?
Nearly the same fund. BCI costs less.
BCI has a lower expense ratio. BCI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCI | HCOM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26%Best | 0.59% |
| AUM | $3.5B | $9M |
| Dividend Yield | 12.50% | 10.95% |
| Holdings | 16 | 55 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6%Best | 14.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.5%Best | -28.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.8 years | $12,155Best | $10,261 |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Hartford Funds |
| Category | Commodity | Commodity |
| Style | Commodities | Commodities |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Sep 14, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 481 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BCI has data through Oct 14, 2026 and HCOM through Jun 20, 2025.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2021 to Jun 20, 2025 (3.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HCOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.7% compared with 14.6% for BCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.5% for BCI and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCI charges 0.26% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $59 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCI currently yields 12.50% against 10.95% for HCOM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCI and HCOM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCI or HCOM?
BCI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while HCOM charges 0.59%. BCI is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BCI or HCOM?
HCOM has been the more volatile fund at 14.7% annualized versus 14.6% for BCI. Worst drawdown: BCI -26.5% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both BCI and HCOM?
BCI and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCI or HCOM?
BCI yields 12.50% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so BCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HCOM better than BCI?
BCI has a lower expense ratio. BCI led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.