BCKT vs VYM

BCKT vs VYM

Which is better, BCKT or VYM?

VYM has been ahead.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCKTVYM
Expense Ratio0.25%0.04%Best
AUM$2M$78.9B
Dividend Yield25.54%2.37%
Holdings79608
YTD Return-11.24%+11.83%Best
1Y Return-10.71%+15.96%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+18.60%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.51%
Volatility (annualized)4.2%Best10.8%
Max Drawdown-12.2%-6.7%Best
$10,000 over 1.1 years$8,930$11,672Best
Fund FamilyStone Ridge Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
Style-Large Cap Value
InceptionSep 24, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.1 years).

BCKT vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.

BCKT vs VYM Performance

LifeX 2030 Income Bucket ETF (BCKT) is an ETF from Stone Ridge Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCKT returned -10.71% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, BCKT is down 11.24% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.8% compared with 4.2% for BCKT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.2% for BCKT and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCKT charges 0.25% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $4 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCKT currently yields 25.54% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 22 holdings in BCKT and 602 in VYM, totalling 66.8% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 22 positions we hold weights for in BCKT and 602 in VYM, against full books of 79 and 608.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BCKT and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BCKTVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCKT or VYM?

BCKT has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BCKT or VYM?

Over the past year BCKT returned -10.71% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), BCKT annualized -9.78% vs +15.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BCKT or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 10.8% annualized versus 4.2% for BCKT. Worst drawdown: BCKT -12.2% vs VYM -6.7%.

Should I hold both BCKT and VYM?

BCKT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCKT or VYM?

BCKT yields 25.54% while VYM yields 2.37%, so BCKT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than BCKT?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.