BCPL vs JHCP

BCPL vs JHCP

Which is better, BCPL or JHCP?

JHCP costs less.

JHCP has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: JHCP

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCPLJHCP
Expense Ratio0.40%0.36%Best
AUM$327M$340M
Dividend Yield2.85%4.62%
Holdings366987
YTD Return-2.66%-2.37%Best
1Y Return--2.10%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementJohn Hancock Investment Management
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
StyleInvestment Grade BondInvestment Grade Bond
InceptionJan 12, 2026Dec 18, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BCPL vs JHCP growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BCPL against instead:BCPL vs SPYBCPL vs QQQBCPL vs VOOBCPL vs VTIJHCP against:JHCP vs VXUS

BCPL vs JHCP Performance

BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and John Hancock Core Plus Bond ETF (JHCP) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, BCPL is down 2.66% versus a loss of 2.37% for JHCP.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCPL charges 0.40% per year while JHCP charges 0.36%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $36 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCPL currently yields 2.85% against 4.62% for JHCP.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 110 holdings in BCPL and 436 in JHCP, totalling 38.1% and 40.1% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 9 positions appear in both.

9 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in BCPL and 436 in JHCP, against full books of 366 and 987.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCPLWeight in JHCPDifference
MS V5.948 01/19/38Morgan Stanley 5.95% 01/19/380.39%0.19%0.20%
SO V6.375 03/15/55 2Southern Co 6.38 2055-03-150.34%0.18%0.16%
ET V6.75 02/15/56Et V6.75 02/15/56 Corp0.23%0.10%0.13%
BAC V5.518 10/25/35Bank Of America Corp Subordinated 10/35 Var % 0.29%0.03%0.26%
EXC V6.5 03/15/55Exelon Corporation 6.5% Mar 15, 20550.29%0.02%0.27%
EPD 5.35 01/31/33Enterprise Produ 5.35 01/31/20330.23%0.03%0.20%
GLP 8.25 01/15/32 14Global Partners Lp / Glp Finance Corp Corp. Note 2032-01-150.23%0.02%0.21%
AER V6.5 01/31/56Aercap Ireland Cap/Globa Company Guar 01/56 Var0.12%0.12%0.00%
JMIKE 2024-1A A2Jersey Mikes Fdg Llc 5.636% 02/15/2055 144A0.17%0.03%0.14%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BCPL and JHCP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BCPLJHCP

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCPL or JHCP?

BCPL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while JHCP charges 0.36%. JHCP is the cheaper option, by $4 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCPL or JHCP?

BCPL yields 2.85% while JHCP yields 4.62%, so JHCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is JHCP better than BCPL?

JHCP has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.