BCPL vs JHCR
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF vs John Hancock Core Bond ETF
Which is better, BCPL or JHCR?
JHCR costs less.
JHCR has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCPL | JHCR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.29%Best |
| AUM | $327M | $2.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.85% | 4.36% |
| Holdings | 366 | 1,940 |
| YTD Return | -2.66% | -2.26%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | -2.08% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | John Hancock Investment Management |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Style | Investment Grade Bond | Investment Grade Bond |
| Inception | Jan 12, 2026 | Dec 18, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BCPL vs JHCR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCPL vs JHCR Performance
BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and John Hancock Core Bond ETF (JHCR) is an ETF from John Hancock Investment Management. Year to date, BCPL is down 2.66% versus a loss of 2.26% for JHCR.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCPL charges 0.40% per year while JHCR charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $29 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCPL currently yields 2.85% against 4.36% for JHCR.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 110 holdings in BCPL and 389 in JHCR, totalling 38.1% and 40.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 6 positions appear in both.
6 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in BCPL and 389 in JHCR, against full books of 366 and 1,940.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCPL | Weight in JHCR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MS V5.948 01/19/38Morgan Stanley 5.95% 01/19/38 | 0.39% | 0.20% | 0.19% |
| SO V6.375 03/15/55 2Southern Co 6.38 2055-03-15 | 0.34% | 0.15% | 0.19% |
| BAC V5.518 10/25/35Bank Of America Corp Subordinated 10/35 Var % | 0.29% | 0.04% | 0.25% |
| EXC V6.5 03/15/55Exelon Corporation 6.5% Mar 15, 2055 | 0.29% | 0.03% | 0.26% |
| EPD 5.35 01/31/33Enterprise Produ 5.35 01/31/2033 | 0.23% | 0.06% | 0.17% |
| JMIKE 2024-1A A2Jersey Mikes Fdg Llc 5.636% 02/15/2055 144A | 0.17% | 0.07% | 0.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCPL and JHCR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCPL or JHCR?
BCPL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while JHCR charges 0.29%. JHCR is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCPL or JHCR?
BCPL yields 2.85% while JHCR yields 4.36%, so JHCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is JHCR better than BCPL?
JHCR has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.