BCPL vs NJNK

BCPL vs NJNK

Which is better, BCPL or NJNK?

BCPL costs less.

BCPL has a lower expense ratio.

Lower Fees: BCPL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBCPLNJNK
Expense Ratio0.40%Best0.46%
AUM$327M$40M
Dividend Yield2.85%6.59%
Holdings366934
YTD Return-2.66%-0.47%Best
1Y Return-+1.64%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementColumbia Threadneedle Investments
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
StyleInvestment Grade BondInvestment Grade Bond
InceptionJan 12, 2026Sep 5, 2024

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

BCPL vs NJNK growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare BCPL against instead:BCPL vs SPYBCPL vs QQQBCPL vs VOOBCPL vs VTINJNK against:NJNK vs VXUS

BCPL vs NJNK Performance

BNY Mellon Core Plus ETF (BCPL) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Columbia US High Yield ETF (NJNK) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Year to date, BCPL is down 2.66% versus a loss of 0.47% for NJNK.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BCPL charges 0.40% per year while NJNK charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $46 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCPL currently yields 2.85% against 6.59% for NJNK.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 110 holdings in BCPL and 358 in NJNK, totalling 38.1% and 74.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 2 positions appear in both.

2 positions in common, counted across the 110 positions we hold weights for in BCPL and 358 in NJNK, against full books of 366 and 934.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BCPLWeight in NJNKDifference
POST 6.375 03/01/33 0.16%0.36%0.20%
SNAP 6.875 03/01/33 0.11%0.36%0.25%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BCPL and NJNK you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BCPLNJNK

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BCPL or NJNK?

BCPL has an expense ratio of 0.40% while NJNK charges 0.46%. BCPL is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, BCPL or NJNK?

BCPL yields 2.85% while NJNK yields 6.59%, so NJNK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is NJNK better than BCPL?

BCPL has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.