BCTK vs DWUS
Baron Technology ETF vs Advisorshares Dorsey Wright Fsm Us Core Etf
Which is better, BCTK or DWUS?
BCTK has been ahead.
BCTK has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCTK | DWUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 1.08% |
| AUM | - | $122M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.03% |
| Holdings | 40 | 4 |
| YTD Return | +17.64%Best | +9.20% |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.11% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.82% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.99% |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Advisor Shares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Dec 26, 2019 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BCTK vs DWUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCTK vs DWUS Performance
Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Advisorshares Dorsey Wright Fsm Us Core Etf (DWUS) is an ETF from Advisor Shares. Year to date, BCTK is up 17.64% versus a gain of 9.20% for DWUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCTK charges 0.75% per year while DWUS charges 1.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $108 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCTK currently yields 0.16% against 0.03% for DWUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 39 holdings in BCTK and 4 in DWUS, totalling 99.5% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 4 in DWUS, against full books of 40 and 4.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 39 and 4 positions we hold weights for.
BCTK holds 32 positions DWUS does not, 83.4% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.12%, SPCX 6.67%, LRCX 6.61%, GOOG 6.29%, SPOT 5.28%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCTK and DWUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCTK or DWUS?
BCTK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while DWUS charges 1.08%. BCTK is the cheaper option, by $33 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCTK or DWUS?
BCTK yields 0.16% while DWUS yields 0.03%, so BCTK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DWUS better than BCTK?
BCTK has a lower expense ratio. BCTK led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.