BCTK vs GRNY
Baron Technology ETF vs Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
Which is better, BCTK or GRNY?
BCTK has been ahead.
BCTK led over 1Y. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCTK | GRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Tie | 0.75%Tie |
| AUM | - | $4.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.16% | 0.13% |
| Holdings | 40 | 86 |
| YTD Return | +17.64%Best | +10.83% |
| 1Y Return | - | +10.25% |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9% | 27.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Baron Funds | Fundstrat Capital |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 12, 2025 | Nov 7, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BCTK vs GRNY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BCTK vs GRNY Performance
Baron Technology ETF (BCTK) is an ETF from Baron Funds and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is an ETF from Fundstrat Capital. Year to date, BCTK is up 17.64% versus a gain of 10.83% for GRNY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCTK charges 0.75% per year while GRNY charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $75 annually. On income, BCTK currently yields 0.16% against 0.13% for GRNY.
Holdings Overlap
33.0% of BCTK's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 20.2% of GRNY's money is in holdings BCTK also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 42 in GRNY, against full books of 40 and 86.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 34 positions for GRNY that do not appear in our book for BCTK (79.2% of the fund), and 24 for BCTK that do not appear in GRNY (50.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCTK | Weight in GRNY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.12% | 2.47% | 4.65% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 6.67% | 2.63% | 4.04% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.78% | 2.62% | 2.16% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.73% | 3.06% | 0.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.58% | 2.18% | 2.40% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.30% | 2.37% | 0.93% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 1.28% | 2.58% | 1.30% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 1.49% | 2.28% | 0.79% |
33.0% of BCTK is already inside GRNY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCTK or GRNY?
BCTK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while GRNY charges 0.75%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.
What is the holdings overlap between BCTK and GRNY?
33.0% of BCTK's money is in holdings GRNY also owns. 20.2% of GRNY's is in holdings BCTK also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 39 positions we hold weights for in BCTK and 42 in GRNY.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCTK or GRNY?
BCTK yields 0.16% while GRNY yields 0.13%, so BCTK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is GRNY better than BCTK?
BCTK led over 1Y. GRNY is less concentrated, with 27.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.