BCUS vs CGCV
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF vs Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
Which is better, BCUS or CGCV?
CGCV has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCUS | CGCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $149M | $2.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 1.59% |
| Holdings | 62 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +2.72% | +8.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.65% | +11.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 9.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -13.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $11,696 | $13,706Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Bancreek Capital Advisors | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | Jun 25, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
BCUS vs CGCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
BCUS vs CGCV Performance
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF (BCUS) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year BCUS returned +2.65% while CGCV returned +11.37%. Year to date, BCUS is up 2.72% versus a gain of 8.70% for CGCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for BCUS and -13.1% for CGCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCUS charges 0.70% per year while CGCV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $33 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCUS currently yields 0.10% against 1.59% for CGCV.
Holdings Overlap
15.9% of BCUS's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 9.9% of CGCV's money is in holdings BCUS also owns.
BCUS and CGCV share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCUS and 73 in CGCV, against full books of 62 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 65 positions for CGCV that do not appear in our book for BCUS (84.8% of the fund), and 22 for BCUS that do not appear in CGCV (70.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCUS and CGCV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCUS or CGCV?
BCUS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while CGCV charges 0.33%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BCUS or CGCV?
Over the past year BCUS returned +2.65% vs +11.37% for CGCV, so CGCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BCUS annualized +7.05% vs +14.69% for CGCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BCUS or CGCV?
BCUS has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: BCUS -18.2% vs CGCV -13.1%.
Should I hold both BCUS and CGCV?
BCUS and CGCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BCUS and CGCV?
15.9% of BCUS's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 9.9% of CGCV's is in holdings BCUS also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCUS and 73 in CGCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCUS or CGCV?
BCUS yields 0.10% while CGCV yields 1.59%, so CGCV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGCV better than BCUS?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.