BCUS vs QLTY
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, BCUS or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. BCUS is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCUS | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $149M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 62 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +2.72% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +2.65% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.84% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -17.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $13,340 | $16,903Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.8%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | Bancreek Capital Advisors | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 21, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.8 years).
BCUS vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.8 years both funds cover.
BCUS vs QLTY Performance
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF (BCUS) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year BCUS returned +2.65% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, BCUS is up 2.72% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 12.0% for QLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for BCUS and -17.0% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCUS charges 0.70% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $50 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCUS currently yields 0.10% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
18.6% of BCUS's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 15.6% of QLTY's money is in holdings BCUS also owns.
BCUS and QLTY share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCUS and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 62 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 40 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for BCUS (84.1% of the fund), and 21 for BCUS that do not appear in QLTY (67.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BCUS and QLTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCUS or QLTY?
BCUS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BCUS or QLTY?
Over the past year BCUS returned +2.65% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BCUS or QLTY?
BCUS has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 12.0% for QLTY. Worst drawdown: BCUS -18.2% vs QLTY -17.0%.
Should I hold both BCUS and QLTY?
BCUS and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BCUS and QLTY?
18.6% of BCUS's money is in holdings QLTY also owns. 15.6% of QLTY's is in holdings BCUS also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCUS and 45 in QLTY.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCUS or QLTY?
BCUS yields 0.10% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so QLTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than BCUS?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y and the full window. BCUS is less concentrated, with 40.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.