BEDY vs FNDX
BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend and Income ETF vs Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF
Which is better, BEDY or FNDX?
BEDY has been ahead.
FNDX has a lower expense ratio. BEDY led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEDY | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.25%Best |
| AUM | $284M | $28.0B |
| Dividend Yield | 5.43% | 1.50% |
| Holdings | 121 | 736 |
| YTD Return | +14.50% | +19.26%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.81% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2025 | Aug 15, 2013 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BEDY vs FNDX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BEDY vs FNDX Performance
BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend and Income ETF (BEDY) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company ETF (FNDX) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, BEDY is up 14.50% versus a gain of 19.26% for FNDX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEDY charges 0.50% per year while FNDX charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $25 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEDY currently yields 5.43% against 1.50% for FNDX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 22.0% of FNDX's money is in holdings BEDY also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BEDY, our book for it covers 90.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
FNDX and BEDY share little of their money.
52 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in BEDY and 733 in FNDX, against full books of 121 and 736.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BEDY | Weight in FNDX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.05% | 3.20% | 1.85% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.03% | 1.57% | 2.46% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.80% | 1.35% | 1.45% |
| TAT&T Inc. | 3.04% | 0.86% | 2.18% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.71% | 0.99% | 1.72% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.83% | 0.69% | 2.14% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 1.00% | 2.37% | 1.37% |
| FITBFifth Third Bancorp | 3.15% | 0.11% | 3.04% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 2.76% | 0.19% | 2.57% |
| AIZAssurant, Inc. | 2.58% | 0.03% | 2.55% |
22.0% of FNDX is already inside BEDY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEDY or FNDX?
BEDY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while FNDX charges 0.25%. FNDX is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BEDY and FNDX?
At least 22.0% of FNDX's money is in holdings BEDY also owns. Our book for BEDY is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 52 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in BEDY and 733 in FNDX.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEDY or FNDX?
BEDY yields 5.43% while FNDX yields 1.50%, so BEDY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FNDX better than BEDY?
FNDX has a lower expense ratio. BEDY led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.