BEDY vs ULVM
BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend and Income ETF vs VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
Which is better, BEDY or ULVM?
BEDY has been ahead.
ULVM has a lower expense ratio. BEDY led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BEDY | ULVM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.20%Best |
| AUM | $284M | $260M |
| Dividend Yield | 5.43% | 1.81% |
| Holdings | 121 | 126 |
| YTD Return | +14.50%Best | +13.74% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.70% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.11% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.11% |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Victory Capital Management Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 8, 2025 | Oct 24, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BEDY vs ULVM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BEDY vs ULVM Performance
BNY Mellon Enhanced Dividend and Income ETF (BEDY) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) is an ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Year to date, BEDY is up 14.50% versus a gain of 13.74% for ULVM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BEDY charges 0.50% per year while ULVM charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $20 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BEDY currently yields 5.43% against 1.81% for ULVM.
Holdings Overlap
At least 12.1% of ULVM's money is in holdings BEDY also owns.
Stated as a floor: for BEDY, our book for it covers 90.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
ULVM and BEDY share little of their money.
15 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in BEDY and 125 in ULVM, against full books of 121 and 126.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BEDY | Weight in ULVM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.71% | 1.19% | 1.52% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.80% | 0.64% | 2.16% |
| COFCapital One Financial Corp. | 1.88% | 0.68% | 1.20% |
| DALDl Co., Ltd. | 1.88% | 0.68% | 1.20% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 1.87% | 0.66% | 1.21% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 1.81% | 0.64% | 1.17% |
| CBChubb Ltd Common Stock Usd 24.15 | 0.96% | 1.20% | 0.24% |
| TGTTARGET CORP | 1.20% | 0.77% | 0.43% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.16% | 0.78% | 0.38% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 0.86% | 1.04% | 0.18% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BEDY and ULVM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BEDY or ULVM?
BEDY has an expense ratio of 0.50% while ULVM charges 0.20%. ULVM is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BEDY and ULVM?
At least 12.1% of ULVM's money is in holdings BEDY also owns. Our book for BEDY is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 15 positions in common, counted across the 57 positions we hold weights for in BEDY and 125 in ULVM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BEDY or ULVM?
BEDY yields 5.43% while ULVM yields 1.81%, so BEDY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ULVM better than BEDY?
ULVM has a lower expense ratio. BEDY led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.