BFEB vs BTGD
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February vs STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF
Which is better, BFEB or BTGD?
Each has led over a different period.
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, BTGD over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFEB | BTGD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.09% |
| AUM | $208M | $102M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 4.28% |
| Holdings | 18 | 10 |
| YTD Return | +11.67%Best | -27.02% |
| 1Y Return | +15.60%Best | -41.02% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1%Best | 53.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8%Best | -58.8% |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $12,891 | $13,122Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Quantify Funds |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2020 | Oct 15, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 16, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
BFEB vs BTGD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
BFEB vs BTGD Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and STKd 100% Bitcoin & 100% Gold ETF (BTGD) is an ETF from Quantify Funds. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while BTGD returned -41.02%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a loss of 27.02% for BTGD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BTGD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.1% compared with 8.1% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -58.8% for BTGD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFEB charges 0.79% per year while BTGD charges 1.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $109 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 4.28% for BTGD.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BFEB and BTGD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFEB or BTGD?
BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while BTGD charges 1.09%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BFEB or BTGD?
Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs -41.02% for BTGD, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BFEB annualized +13.54% vs +14.55% for BTGD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BFEB or BTGD?
BTGD has been the more volatile fund at 53.1% annualized versus 8.1% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs BTGD -58.8%.
Should I hold both BFEB and BTGD?
BFEB and BTGD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or BTGD?
BFEB yields 0.00% while BTGD yields 4.28%, so BTGD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BTGD better than BFEB?
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, BTGD over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.