BFEB vs CONY
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February vs YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, BFEB or CONY?
BFEB has been ahead.
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFEB | CONY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.04% |
| AUM | $208M | $381M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 119.91% |
| Holdings | 18 | 17 |
| YTD Return | +11.67%Best | -21.83% |
| 1Y Return | +15.60%Best | -42.68% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.04%Best | +9.76% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.6%Best | 60.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8%Best | -63.6% |
| $10,000 over 3.2 years | $15,995Best | $13,425 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2020 | Aug 14, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.2 years).
BFEB vs CONY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.2 years both funds cover.
BFEB vs CONY Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while CONY returned -42.68%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a loss of 21.83% for CONY.
Over three years, BFEB compounded at +17.04% per year against +9.76% for CONY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CONY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 60.7% compared with 8.6% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -63.6% for CONY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFEB charges 0.79% per year while CONY charges 1.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $104 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 119.91% for CONY.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BFEB and CONY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFEB or CONY?
BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while CONY charges 1.04%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $25 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BFEB or CONY?
Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs -42.68% for CONY, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BFEB or CONY?
CONY has been the more volatile fund at 60.7% annualized versus 8.6% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs CONY -63.6%.
Should I hold both BFEB and CONY?
BFEB and CONY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or CONY?
BFEB yields 0.00% while CONY yields 119.91%, so CONY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CONY better than BFEB?
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.