BFEB vs CRSH
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February vs YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
Which is better, BFEB or CRSH?
BFEB has been ahead.
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFEB | CRSH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.05% |
| AUM | $208M | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 79.84% |
| Holdings | 18 | 26 |
| YTD Return | +11.67%Best | +11.27% |
| 1Y Return | +15.60%Best | +11.88% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.68% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.4%Best | 40.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.8%Best | -61.5% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $14,173Best | $4,932 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | YieldMax ETF |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2020 | May 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 2, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
BFEB vs CRSH growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
BFEB vs CRSH Performance
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while CRSH returned +11.88%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a gain of 11.27% for CRSH.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CRSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 40.2% compared with 7.4% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -61.5% for CRSH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.41. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFEB charges 0.79% per year while CRSH charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $105 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 79.84% for CRSH.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BFEB and CRSH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFEB or CRSH?
BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while CRSH charges 1.05%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BFEB or CRSH?
Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs +11.88% for CRSH, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BFEB or CRSH?
CRSH has been the more volatile fund at 40.2% annualized versus 7.4% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs CRSH -61.5%.
Should I hold both BFEB and CRSH?
BFEB and CRSH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.41, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or CRSH?
BFEB yields 0.00% while CRSH yields 79.84%, so CRSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CRSH better than BFEB?
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.