BFEB vs GDXY

BFEB vs GDXY

Which is better, BFEB or GDXY?

Each has led over a different period.

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, GDXY over the full window.

Lower Fees: BFEBHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBFEBGDXY
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.00%
AUM$208M$306M
Dividend Yield0.00%81.80%
Holdings1828
YTD Return+11.67%Best-10.44%
1Y Return+15.60%Best-6.69%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.04%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.68%-
Volatility (annualized)7.4%Best33.4%
Max Drawdown-13.8%Best-37.0%
$10,000 over 2.4 years$13,615$14,862Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 3, 2020May 20, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 21, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).

BFEB vs GDXY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.

Compare BFEB against instead:BFEB vs SPYBFEB vs QQQBFEB vs VOOBFEB vs VTIGDXY against:GDXY vs VXUS

BFEB vs GDXY Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while GDXY returned -6.69%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a loss of 10.44% for GDXY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GDXY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 33.4% compared with 7.4% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -37.0% for GDXY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BFEB charges 0.79% per year while GDXY charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $100 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 81.80% for GDXY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BFEB and GDXY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BFEBGDXY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BFEB or GDXY?

BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while GDXY charges 1.00%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BFEB or GDXY?

Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs -6.69% for GDXY, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BFEB annualized +13.72% vs +17.95% for GDXY. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BFEB or GDXY?

GDXY has been the more volatile fund at 33.4% annualized versus 7.4% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs GDXY -37.0%.

Should I hold both BFEB and GDXY?

BFEB and GDXY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or GDXY?

BFEB yields 0.00% while GDXY yields 81.80%, so GDXY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GDXY better than BFEB?

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y, GDXY over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.