BFEB vs HF
Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February vs DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF
Which is better, BFEB or HF?
BFEB has been ahead.
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFEB | HF |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.70% |
| AUM | $208M | $21M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.89% |
| Holdings | 18 | 57 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.2% | 7.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -6.9% | -4.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $12,569Best | $11,548 |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Days Global Advisors |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Feb 3, 2020 | Aug 2, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 671 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BFEB has data through Oct 14, 2026 and HF through Dec 12, 2024.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 3, 2023 to Dec 12, 2024 (1.4 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BFEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.2% compared with 7.3% for HF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.9% for BFEB and -4.3% for HF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFEB charges 0.79% per year while HF charges 1.70%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $170 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.89% for HF.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BFEB and HF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFEB or HF?
BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while HF charges 1.70%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BFEB or HF?
BFEB has been the more volatile fund at 9.2% annualized versus 7.3% for HF. Worst drawdown: BFEB -6.9% vs HF -4.3%.
Should I hold both BFEB and HF?
BFEB and HF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or HF?
BFEB yields 0.00% while HF yields 0.89%, so HF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is HF better than BFEB?
BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.