BFEB vs MSFO

BFEB vs MSFO

Which is better, BFEB or MSFO?

Each has led over a different period.

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and 3Y, MSFO over the full window.

Lower Fees: BFEBHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBFEBMSFO
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.03%
AUM$208M$87M
Dividend Yield0.00%38.50%
Holdings1830
YTD Return+11.67%Best+10.80%
1Y Return+15.60%Best+4.00%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.04%Best+16.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.68%-
Volatility (annualized)8.6%Best23.3%
Max Drawdown-13.8%Best-29.6%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$15,897$16,300Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 3, 2020Aug 24, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 25, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

BFEB vs MSFO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare BFEB against instead:BFEB vs SPYBFEB vs QQQBFEB vs VOOBFEB vs VTIMSFO against:MSFO vs VXUS

BFEB vs MSFO Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax Microsoft Option Income Strategy ETF (MSFO) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while MSFO returned +4.00%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a gain of 10.80% for MSFO.

Over three years, BFEB compounded at +17.04% per year against +16.27% for MSFO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MSFO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 8.6% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -29.6% for MSFO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BFEB charges 0.79% per year while MSFO charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $103 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 38.50% for MSFO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BFEB and MSFO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BFEBMSFO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BFEB or MSFO?

BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while MSFO charges 1.03%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BFEB or MSFO?

Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs +4.00% for MSFO, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BFEB or MSFO?

MSFO has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 8.6% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs MSFO -29.6%.

Should I hold both BFEB and MSFO?

BFEB and MSFO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or MSFO?

BFEB yields 0.00% while MSFO yields 38.50%, so MSFO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is MSFO better than BFEB?

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. BFEB led over 1Y and 3Y, MSFO over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.