BFEB vs QQQY

BFEB vs QQQY

Which is better, BFEB or QQQY?

QQQY has been ahead.

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: BFEBHigher Returns: QQQY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBFEBQQQY
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.01%
AUM$208M$192M
Dividend Yield0.00%33.38%
Holdings1810
YTD Return+11.67%+17.03%Best
1Y Return+15.60%+20.86%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+17.04%+28.44%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+11.68%-
Volatility (annualized)8.2%Best15.4%
Max Drawdown-13.8%-12.6%Best
$10,000 over 3.1 years$15,737$21,154Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustDefiance ETFs, LLC
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 3, 2020Sep 13, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 14, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).

BFEB vs QQQY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

Compare BFEB against instead:BFEB vs SPYBFEB vs QQQBFEB vs VOOBFEB vs VTIQQQY against:QQQY vs VXUS

BFEB vs QQQY Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF (QQQY) is an ETF from Defiance ETFs, LLC. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while QQQY returned +20.86%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a gain of 17.03% for QQQY.

Over three years, BFEB compounded at +17.04% per year against +28.44% for QQQY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 8.2% for BFEB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -12.6% for QQQY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BFEB charges 0.79% per year while QQQY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $101 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 33.38% for QQQY.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BFEB and QQQY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BFEBQQQY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BFEB or QQQY?

BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while QQQY charges 1.01%. BFEB is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BFEB or QQQY?

Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs +20.86% for QQQY, so QQQY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BFEB or QQQY?

QQQY has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 8.2% for BFEB. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs QQQY -12.6%.

Should I hold both BFEB and QQQY?

BFEB and QQQY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or QQQY?

BFEB yields 0.00% while QQQY yields 33.38%, so QQQY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQY better than BFEB?

BFEB has a lower expense ratio. QQQY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.