BFEB vs ZNOV

BFEB vs ZNOV

Which is better, BFEB or ZNOV?

BFEB has been ahead.

BFEB led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: BFEB

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBFEBZNOV
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$208M$105M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1815
YTD Return+11.67%Best+5.16%
1Y Return+15.60%Best+6.13%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.04%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.68%-
Volatility (annualized)8.2%2.7%Best
Max Drawdown-13.8%-3.3%Best
$10,000 over 1.9 years$12,855Best$11,225
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionFeb 3, 2020Nov 1, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).

BFEB vs ZNOV growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

Compare BFEB against instead:BFEB vs SPYBFEB vs QQQBFEB vs VOOBFEB vs VTIZNOV against:ZNOV vs VXUS

BFEB vs ZNOV Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr November (ZNOV) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% while ZNOV returned +6.13%. Year to date, BFEB is up 11.67% versus a gain of 5.16% for ZNOV.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BFEB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.2% compared with 2.7% for ZNOV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BFEB and -3.3% for ZNOV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BFEB charges 0.79% per year while ZNOV charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, BFEB currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZNOV.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BFEB and ZNOV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BFEBZNOV

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BFEB or ZNOV?

BFEB has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZNOV charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, BFEB or ZNOV?

Over the past year BFEB returned +15.60% vs +6.13% for ZNOV, so BFEB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BFEB annualized +14.13% vs +6.27% for ZNOV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BFEB or ZNOV?

BFEB has been the more volatile fund at 8.2% annualized versus 2.7% for ZNOV. Worst drawdown: BFEB -13.8% vs ZNOV -3.3%.

Should I hold both BFEB and ZNOV?

BFEB and ZNOV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BFEB or ZNOV?

BFEB yields 0.00% while ZNOV yields 0.00%, so ZNOV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZNOV better than BFEB?

BFEB led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.91. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.