BGGG vs CNXT
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF vs VanEck ChiNext ETF
Which is better, BGGG or CNXT?
CNXT has been ahead.
CNXT has a lower expense ratio. CNXT led over 1Y. BGGG is less concentrated, with 52.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGGG | CNXT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.65%Best |
| AUM | $282M | $83M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.18% |
| Holdings | 43 | 196 |
| YTD Return | -6.81%Best | -9.60% |
| 1Y Return | - | +1.51% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.72% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | -2.73% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.5%Best | 54.4% |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | Jul 23, 2014 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BGGG vs CNXT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGGG vs CNXT Performance
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and VanEck ChiNext ETF (CNXT) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, BGGG is down 6.81% versus a loss of 9.60% for CNXT.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGGG charges 0.70% per year while CNXT charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $65 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGGG currently yields 0.00% against 0.18% for CNXT.
Holdings Overlap
3.1% of BGGG's money is in holdings CNXT also owns. 14.1% of CNXT's money is in holdings BGGG also owns.
CNXT and BGGG share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 97 in CNXT, against full books of 43 and 196.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 0 positions for CNXT that do not appear in our book for BGGG (0.0% of the fund), and 24 for BGGG that do not appear in CNXT (59.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGGG | Weight in CNXT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 300750:SHContemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. Class A | 3.15% | 14.07% | 10.92% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGGG and CNXT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGGG or CNXT?
BGGG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while CNXT charges 0.65%. CNXT is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BGGG and CNXT?
14.1% of CNXT's money is in holdings BGGG also owns. 14.1% of CNXT's is in holdings BGGG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 97 in CNXT.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGGG or CNXT?
BGGG yields 0.00% while CNXT yields 0.18%, so CNXT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CNXT better than BGGG?
CNXT has a lower expense ratio. CNXT led over 1Y. BGGG is less concentrated, with 52.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.