BGGG vs FFND
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF vs One Global ETF
Which is better, BGGG or FFND?
FFND has been ahead.
BGGG has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGGG | FFND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70%Best | 1.00% |
| AUM | $282M | $96M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.61% |
| Holdings | 43 | 92 |
| YTD Return | -6.81% | +4.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +7.86% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.41% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +4.62% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.5% | 27.0%Best |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | The Future Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | Aug 24, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BGGG vs FFND growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGGG vs FFND Performance
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and One Global ETF (FFND) is an ETF from The Future Fund. Year to date, BGGG is down 6.81% versus a gain of 4.71% for FFND.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGGG charges 0.70% per year while FFND charges 1.00%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $100 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGGG currently yields 0.00% against 0.61% for FFND.
Holdings Overlap
18.7% of BGGG's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 8.9% of FFND's money is in holdings BGGG also owns.
BGGG and FFND share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 88 in FFND, against full books of 43 and 92.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 64 positions for FFND that do not appear in our book for BGGG (70.9% of the fund), and 20 for BGGG that do not appear in FFND (40.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGGG and FFND you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGGG or FFND?
BGGG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while FFND charges 1.00%. BGGG is the cheaper option, by $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BGGG and FFND?
18.7% of BGGG's money is in holdings FFND also owns. 8.9% of FFND's is in holdings BGGG also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 88 in FFND.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGGG or FFND?
BGGG yields 0.00% while FFND yields 0.61%, so FFND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFND better than BGGG?
BGGG has a lower expense ratio. FFND led over 1Y. FFND is less concentrated, with 27.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.