BGGG vs KLXY
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF vs KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
Which is better, BGGG or KLXY?
KLXY has been ahead.
KLXY has a lower expense ratio. KLXY led over 1Y. BGGG is less concentrated, with 52.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGGG | KLXY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $282M | $2M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.84% |
| Holdings | 43 | 31 |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 16.1% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -26.6% |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.5%Best | 64.8% |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | KraneShares |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | Sep 7, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 215 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BGGG has data through Oct 14, 2026 and KLXY through Mar 13, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGGG charges 0.70% per year while KLXY charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $69 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGGG currently yields 0.00% against 0.84% for KLXY.
Holdings Overlap
1.3% of BGGG's money is in holdings KLXY also owns. 4.1% of KLXY's money is in holdings BGGG also owns.
KLXY and BGGG share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 245 days apart, BGGG as of Oct 2, 2026 and KLXY as of Jan 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 23 in KLXY, against full books of 43 and 31.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 7 positions for KLXY that do not appear in our book for BGGG (30.3% of the fund), and 24 for BGGG that do not appear in KLXY (59.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGGG | Weight in KLXY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MONC:MIMoncler Spa | 1.25% | 4.08% | 2.83% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGGG and KLXY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGGG or KLXY?
BGGG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while KLXY charges 0.69%. KLXY is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BGGG and KLXY?
4.1% of KLXY's money is in holdings BGGG also owns. 4.1% of KLXY's is in holdings BGGG also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 23 in KLXY.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGGG or KLXY?
BGGG yields 0.00% while KLXY yields 0.84%, so KLXY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is KLXY better than BGGG?
KLXY has a lower expense ratio. KLXY led over 1Y. BGGG is less concentrated, with 52.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 64.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.