BGIG vs IVV
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BGIG or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGIG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.91% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 51 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +12.88% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.26% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.39% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.3%Best | 12.3% |
| Max Drawdown | -13.2%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $15,623 | $18,126Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.2% | 38.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Bahl & Gaynor | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 14, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
BGIG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
BGIG vs IVV Performance
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF (BGIG) is an ETF from Bahl & Gaynor and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BGIG returned +14.26% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, BGIG is up 12.88% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, BGIG compounded at +17.39% per year against +22.46% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 9.3% for BGIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.2% for BGIG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGIG charges 0.45% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGIG currently yields 1.91% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
92.0% of BGIG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.4% of IVV's money is in holdings BGIG also owns.
Most of BGIG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
45 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 506 in IVV, against full books of 51 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 455 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BGIG (79.1% of the fund), and 1 for BGIG that do not appear in IVV (1.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGIG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.26% | 5.76% | 0.50% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.50% | 2.47% | 2.03% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.17% | 0.94% | 3.23% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.24% | 0.69% | 3.55% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 4.33% | 0.50% | 3.83% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.04% | 1.34% | 1.70% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.93% | 1.39% | 1.54% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 3.66% | 0.62% | 3.04% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 3.75% | 0.13% | 3.62% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.63% | 0.65% | 1.98% |
92.0% of BGIG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGIG or IVV?
BGIG has an expense ratio of 0.45% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGIG or IVV?
Over the past year BGIG returned +14.26% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGIG or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 9.3% for BGIG. Worst drawdown: BGIG -13.2% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both BGIG and IVV?
BGIG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGIG and IVV?
92.0% of BGIG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.4% of IVV's is in holdings BGIG also owns. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 48 positions we hold weights for in BGIG and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGIG or IVV?
BGIG yields 1.91% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BGIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BGIG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.