BGRO vs FFOG
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF vs Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Which is better, BGRO or FFOG?
Nearly the same fund. FFOG costs less.
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. BGRO led over 1Y, FFOG over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. BGRO is less concentrated, with 48.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGRO | FFOG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.41%Best |
| AUM | $10M | $386M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 38 | 43 |
| YTD Return | +12.63%Best | +8.34% |
| 1Y Return | +13.39%Best | +7.46% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.71% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4%Best | 20.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -24.9%Best | -25.4% |
| $10,000 over 2.4 years | $14,149 | $14,241Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.7%Best | 55.5% |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 4, 2024 | Nov 6, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 5, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.4 years).
BGRO vs FFOG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.4 years both funds cover.
BGRO vs FFOG Performance
iShares Large Cap Growth Active ETF (BGRO) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Franklin Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FFOG) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year BGRO returned +13.39% while FFOG returned +7.46%. Year to date, BGRO is up 12.63% versus a gain of 8.34% for FFOG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FFOG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 18.4% for BGRO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for BGRO and -25.4% for FFOG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGRO charges 0.55% per year while FFOG charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $41 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGRO currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for FFOG.
Holdings Overlap
55.1% of BGRO's money is in holdings FFOG also owns. 61.0% of FFOG's money is in holdings BGRO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGRO and 41 in FFOG, against full books of 38 and 43.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 17 positions for FFOG that do not appear in our book for BGRO (24.4% of the fund), and 23 for BGRO that do not appear in FFOG (42.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGRO | Weight in FFOG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 13.22% | 10.05% | 3.17% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.16% | 8.49% | 4.33% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 4.62% | 7.96% | 3.34% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 4.66% | 5.50% | 0.84% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.01% | 3.90% | 1.11% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.37% | 4.98% | 2.61% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 2.58% | 2.79% | 0.21% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 4.06% | 0.97% | 3.09% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.88% | 2.01% | 0.87% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.33% | 3.45% | 2.12% |
61.0% of FFOG is already inside BGRO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGRO or FFOG?
BGRO has an expense ratio of 0.55% while FFOG charges 0.41%. FFOG is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGRO or FFOG?
Over the past year BGRO returned +13.39% vs +7.46% for FFOG, so BGRO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGRO annualized +15.56% vs +15.87% for FFOG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGRO or FFOG?
FFOG has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 18.4% for BGRO. Worst drawdown: BGRO -24.9% vs FFOG -25.4%.
Should I hold both BGRO and FFOG?
BGRO and FFOG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGRO and FFOG?
61.0% of FFOG's money is in holdings BGRO also owns. 61.0% of FFOG's is in holdings BGRO also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in BGRO and 41 in FFOG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGRO or FFOG?
BGRO yields 0.00% while FFOG yields 0.00%, so FFOG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FFOG better than BGRO?
FFOG has a lower expense ratio. BGRO led over 1Y, FFOG over the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. BGRO is less concentrated, with 48.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.