BGY vs CGCV
BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust vs Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF
Which is better, BGY or CGCV?
CGCV has been ahead.
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGY | CGCV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $569M | $2.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.03% | 1.59% |
| Holdings | 127 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +0.81% | +8.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.95% | +11.37%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.86% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.0% | 9.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -13.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.3 years | $12,210 | $13,706Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.8% | 33.0%Best |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | Capital Group (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 25, 2007 | Jun 25, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).
BGY vs CGCV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.
BGY vs CGCV Performance
BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust (BGY) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF (CGCV) is an ETF from Capital Group (US). Over the past year BGY returned +5.95% while CGCV returned +11.37%. Year to date, BGY is up 0.81% versus a gain of 8.70% for CGCV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.0% compared with 9.9% for CGCV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BGY and -13.1% for CGCV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGY charges 0.99% per year while CGCV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $33 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGY currently yields 8.03% against 1.59% for CGCV.
Holdings Overlap
7.5% of BGY's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 2.1% of CGCV's money is in holdings BGY also owns.
BGY and CGCV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 95 days apart, BGY as of Jun 30, 2026 and CGCV as of Oct 3, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in BGY and 73 in CGCV, against full books of 127 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 69 positions for CGCV that do not appear in our book for BGY (94.8% of the fund), and 1 for BGY that do not appear in CGCV (0.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGY | Weight in CGCV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2330:TWTsmc | 7.53% | 2.11% | 5.42% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGY and CGCV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGY or CGCV?
BGY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while CGCV charges 0.33%. CGCV is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGY or CGCV?
Over the past year BGY returned +5.95% vs +11.37% for CGCV, so CGCV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BGY annualized +9.07% vs +14.69% for CGCV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGY or CGCV?
BGY has been the more volatile fund at 13.0% annualized versus 9.9% for CGCV. Worst drawdown: BGY -15.5% vs CGCV -13.1%.
Should I hold both BGY and CGCV?
BGY and CGCV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BGY and CGCV?
7.5% of BGY's money is in holdings CGCV also owns. 2.1% of CGCV's is in holdings BGY also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in BGY and 73 in CGCV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGY or CGCV?
BGY yields 8.03% while CGCV yields 1.59%, so BGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CGCV better than BGY?
CGCV has a lower expense ratio. CGCV led over 1Y and the full window. CGCV is less concentrated, with 33.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.