BGY vs QLTY
BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust vs GMO US Quality ETF
Which is better, BGY or QLTY?
QLTY has been ahead.
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BGY is less concentrated, with 35.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGY | QLTY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $569M | $5.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 8.03% | 0.66% |
| Holdings | 127 | 90 |
| YTD Return | +0.81% | +14.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | +5.95% | +20.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.04% | +21.84%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.86% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5%Best | -17.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $13,977 | $17,733Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.8%Best | 45.5% |
| Fund Family | BlackRock, Inc. (US) | GMO |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 25, 2007 | Nov 13, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.9 years).
BGY vs QLTY growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
BGY vs QLTY Performance
BlackRock Enhanced International Dividend Trust (BGY) is an ETF from BlackRock, Inc. (US) and GMO US Quality ETF (QLTY) is an ETF from GMO. Over the past year BGY returned +5.95% while QLTY returned +20.95%. Year to date, BGY is up 0.81% versus a gain of 14.13% for QLTY.
Over three years, BGY compounded at +13.04% per year against +21.84% for QLTY.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BGY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 11.9% for QLTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BGY and -17.0% for QLTY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGY charges 0.99% per year while QLTY charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $50 annually, a gap of $49 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGY currently yields 8.03% against 0.66% for QLTY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 47 holdings in BGY and 45 in QLTY, totalling 98.3% and 99.7% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 99 days apart, BGY as of Jun 30, 2026 and QLTY as of Oct 7, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in BGY and 45 in QLTY, against full books of 127 and 90.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 45 positions for QLTY that do not appear in our book for BGY (99.7% of the fund), and 1 for BGY that do not appear in QLTY (0.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGY and QLTY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGY or QLTY?
BGY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while QLTY charges 0.50%. QLTY is the cheaper option, by $49 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BGY or QLTY?
Over the past year BGY returned +5.95% vs +20.95% for QLTY, so QLTY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BGY or QLTY?
BGY has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 11.9% for QLTY. Worst drawdown: BGY -15.5% vs QLTY -17.0%.
Should I hold both BGY and QLTY?
BGY and QLTY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGY or QLTY?
BGY yields 8.03% while QLTY yields 0.66%, so BGY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QLTY better than BGY?
QLTY has a lower expense ratio. QLTY led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. BGY is less concentrated, with 35.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.