BITC vs BUFM
Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF vs AB Moderate Buffer ETF
Which is better, BITC or BUFM?
BUFM has been ahead.
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BITC | BUFM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.88% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $492M |
| Dividend Yield | 77.90% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 3 | 7 |
| YTD Return | +3.13% | +4.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | -7.62% | +7.70%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.02% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 5.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.2% | -9.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.8 years | $7,901 | $11,674Best |
| Fund Family | Bitwise | AllianceBernstein L.P. |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Mar 20, 2023 | Dec 9, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).
BITC vs BUFM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.
BITC vs BUFM Performance
Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (BITC) is an ETF from Bitwise and AB Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFM) is an ETF from AllianceBernstein L.P.. Over the past year BITC returned -7.62% while BUFM returned +7.70%. Year to date, BITC is up 3.13% versus a gain of 4.67% for BUFM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BITC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 5.3% for BUFM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for BITC and -9.4% for BUFM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BITC charges 0.88% per year while BUFM charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $69 annually, a gap of $19 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITC currently yields 77.90% against 0.00% for BUFM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BITC and BUFM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BITC or BUFM?
BITC has an expense ratio of 0.88% while BUFM charges 0.69%. BUFM is the cheaper option, by $19 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BITC or BUFM?
Over the past year BITC returned -7.62% vs +7.70% for BUFM, so BUFM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BITC annualized -12.27% vs +8.98% for BUFM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BITC or BUFM?
BITC has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 5.3% for BUFM. Worst drawdown: BITC -33.2% vs BUFM -9.4%.
Should I hold both BITC and BUFM?
BITC and BUFM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BITC or BUFM?
BITC yields 77.90% while BUFM yields 0.00%, so BITC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is BUFM better than BITC?
BUFM has a lower expense ratio. BUFM led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.