BITC vs GJUN

BITC vs GJUN

Which is better, BITC or GJUN?

Each has led over a different period.

GJUN has a lower expense ratio. BITC led over 3Y and the full window, GJUN over 1Y.

Lower Fees: GJUNHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBITCGJUN
Expense Ratio0.88%0.85%Best
AUM$14M$511M
Dividend Yield77.90%0.00%
Holdings310
YTD Return+3.13%+6.43%Best
1Y Return-7.62%+8.70%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+34.02%Best+12.00%
Volatility (annualized)44.5%5.9%Best
Max Drawdown-33.2%-11.0%Best
$10,000 over 3.3 years$23,385Best$14,082
Fund FamilyBitwiseFirst Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleMulti AlternativeMulti Alternative
InceptionMar 20, 2023Jun 16, 2023

Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 20, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.3 years).

BITC vs GJUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.

Compare BITC against instead:BITC vs SPYBITC vs QQQBITC vs VOOBITC vs VTIGJUN against:GJUN vs VXUS

BITC vs GJUN Performance

Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (BITC) is an ETF from Bitwise and FT Vest US Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (GJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year BITC returned -7.62% while GJUN returned +8.70%. Year to date, BITC is up 3.13% versus a gain of 6.43% for GJUN.

Over three years, BITC compounded at +34.02% per year against +12.00% for GJUN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BITC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.5% compared with 5.9% for GJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for BITC and -11.0% for GJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BITC charges 0.88% per year while GJUN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $85 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BITC currently yields 77.90% against 0.00% for GJUN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BITC and GJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BITCGJUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BITC or GJUN?

BITC has an expense ratio of 0.88% while GJUN charges 0.85%. GJUN is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BITC or GJUN?

Over the past year BITC returned -7.62% vs +8.70% for GJUN, so GJUN leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BITC or GJUN?

BITC has been the more volatile fund at 44.5% annualized versus 5.9% for GJUN. Worst drawdown: BITC -33.2% vs GJUN -11.0%.

Should I hold both BITC and GJUN?

BITC and GJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BITC or GJUN?

BITC yields 77.90% while GJUN yields 0.00%, so BITC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is GJUN better than BITC?

GJUN has a lower expense ratio. BITC led over 3Y and the full window, GJUN over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.