BJAN vs FIAT

BJAN vs FIAT

Which is better, BJAN or FIAT?

Each has led over a different period.

BJAN has a lower expense ratio. BJAN led over the full window, FIAT over 1Y.

Lower Fees: BJANHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBJANFIAT
Expense Ratio0.79%Best1.05%
AUM$351M$30M
Dividend Yield0.00%122.18%
Holdings1815
YTD Return+10.65%Best+4.11%
1Y Return+15.29%+35.51%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+17.60%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.73%-
Volatility (annualized)7.7%Best55.0%
Max Drawdown-13.8%Best-70.5%
$10,000 over 2.3 years$13,405Best$5,438
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustYieldMax ETF
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionDec 31, 2018Jul 9, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.3 years).

BJAN vs FIAT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.3 years both funds cover.

Compare BJAN against instead:BJAN vs SPYBJAN vs QQQBJAN vs VOOBJAN vs VTIFIAT against:FIAT vs VXUS

BJAN vs FIAT Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) is an ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year BJAN returned +15.29% while FIAT returned +35.51%. Year to date, BJAN is up 10.65% versus a gain of 4.11% for FIAT.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

FIAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 55.0% compared with 7.7% for BJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BJAN and -70.5% for FIAT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.42. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BJAN charges 0.79% per year while FIAT charges 1.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $105 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJAN currently yields 0.00% against 122.18% for FIAT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BJAN and FIAT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BJANFIAT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BJAN or FIAT?

BJAN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while FIAT charges 1.05%. BJAN is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BJAN or FIAT?

Over the past year BJAN returned +15.29% vs +35.51% for FIAT, so FIAT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BJAN annualized +13.59% vs -23.27% for FIAT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BJAN or FIAT?

FIAT has been the more volatile fund at 55.0% annualized versus 7.7% for BJAN. Worst drawdown: BJAN -13.8% vs FIAT -70.5%.

Should I hold both BJAN and FIAT?

BJAN and FIAT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.42, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BJAN or FIAT?

BJAN yields 0.00% while FIAT yields 122.18%, so FIAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is FIAT better than BJAN?

BJAN has a lower expense ratio. BJAN led over the full window, FIAT over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.