BJAN vs TJAN

BJAN vs TJAN

Which is better, BJAN or TJAN?

BJAN has been ahead.

BJAN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: BJAN

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBJANTJAN
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$351M$32M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1815
YTD Return+10.65%Best+5.01%
1Y Return+15.29%Best+6.30%
3Y Return (annualized)+17.60%-
5Y Return (annualized)+10.73%-
Volatility (annualized)8.7%3.2%Best
Max Drawdown-13.8%-4.8%Best
$10,000 over 1.8 years$12,776Best$11,295
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionDec 31, 2018Dec 31, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 2, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.8 years).

BJAN vs TJAN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.8 years both funds cover.

Compare BJAN against instead:BJAN vs SPYBJAN vs QQQBJAN vs VOOBJAN vs VTITJAN against:TJAN vs VXUS

BJAN vs TJAN Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - January (BJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027 (TJAN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BJAN returned +15.29% while TJAN returned +6.30%. Year to date, BJAN is up 10.65% versus a gain of 5.01% for TJAN.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BJAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.7% compared with 3.2% for TJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.8% for BJAN and -4.8% for TJAN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BJAN charges 0.79% per year while TJAN charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, BJAN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for TJAN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BJAN and TJAN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BJANTJAN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BJAN or TJAN?

BJAN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while TJAN charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, BJAN or TJAN?

Over the past year BJAN returned +15.29% vs +6.30% for TJAN, so BJAN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BJAN annualized +14.58% vs +7.00% for TJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BJAN or TJAN?

BJAN has been the more volatile fund at 8.7% annualized versus 3.2% for TJAN. Worst drawdown: BJAN -13.8% vs TJAN -4.8%.

Should I hold both BJAN and TJAN?

BJAN and TJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BJAN or TJAN?

BJAN yields 0.00% while TJAN yields 0.00%, so TJAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is TJAN better than BJAN?

BJAN led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.