BJUL vs ZAUG

BJUL vs ZAUG

Which is better, BJUL or ZAUG?

BJUL has been ahead.

BJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: BJUL

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBJULZAUG
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$364M$165M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1821
YTD Return+9.76%Best+4.59%
1Y Return+12.85%Best+5.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+16.87%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.67%-
Volatility (annualized)8.0%3.0%Best
Max Drawdown-14.1%-4.8%Best
$10,000 over 2.2 years$13,326Best$11,631
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionAug 28, 2018Jul 31, 2024

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 1, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.2 years).

BJUL vs ZAUG growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.

Compare BJUL against instead:BJUL vs SPYBJUL vs QQQBJUL vs VOOBJUL vs VTIZAUG against:ZAUG vs VXUS

BJUL vs ZAUG Performance

Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - July (BJUL) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr August (ZAUG) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BJUL returned +12.85% while ZAUG returned +5.65%. Year to date, BJUL is up 9.76% versus a gain of 4.59% for ZAUG.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BJUL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 8.0% compared with 3.0% for ZAUG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.1% for BJUL and -4.8% for ZAUG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BJUL charges 0.79% per year while ZAUG charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, BJUL currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for ZAUG.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BJUL and ZAUG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BJULZAUG

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BJUL or ZAUG?

BJUL has an expense ratio of 0.79% while ZAUG charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, BJUL or ZAUG?

Over the past year BJUL returned +12.85% vs +5.65% for ZAUG, so BJUL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BJUL annualized +13.94% vs +7.11% for ZAUG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BJUL or ZAUG?

BJUL has been the more volatile fund at 8.0% annualized versus 3.0% for ZAUG. Worst drawdown: BJUL -14.1% vs ZAUG -4.8%.

Should I hold both BJUL and ZAUG?

BJUL and ZAUG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BJUL or ZAUG?

BJUL yields 0.00% while ZAUG yields 0.00%, so ZAUG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZAUG better than BJUL?

BJUL led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.