BJUN vs PAPR

BJUN vs PAPR

Which is better, BJUN or PAPR?

Each has led over a different period.

BJUN led over 3Y and the full window, PAPR over 1Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBJUNPAPR
Expense Ratio0.79%Tie0.79%Tie
AUM$246M$964M
Dividend Yield0.00%0.00%
Holdings1818
YTD Return+6.61%+10.66%Best
1Y Return+9.66%+13.12%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+14.40%Best+11.87%
5Y Return (annualized)+8.40%+8.43%Best
Volatility (annualized)10.1%7.1%Best
Max Drawdown-22.7%-15.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$14,967$14,988Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustInnovator ETFs Trust
CategoryAlternativeAlternative
StyleOption WritingOption Writing
InceptionMay 31, 2019Mar 29, 2019

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 3, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (7.4 years).

BJUN vs PAPR growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.4 years both funds cover.

Compare BJUN against instead:BJUN vs SPYBJUN vs QQQBJUN vs VOOBJUN vs VTIPAPR against:PAPR vs VXUS

BJUN vs PAPR Performance

Innovator US Equity Buffer ETF - June (BJUN) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Innovator US Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year BJUN returned +9.66% while PAPR returned +13.12%. Year to date, BJUN is up 6.61% versus a gain of 10.66% for PAPR.

Over three years, BJUN compounded at +14.40% per year against +11.87% for PAPR; over five years the annualized figures are +8.40% and +8.43% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, BJUN has the edge at +9.62% annualized vs +8.35%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BJUN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.1% compared with 7.1% for PAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.7% for BJUN and -15.3% for PAPR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BJUN charges 0.79% per year while PAPR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $79 annually. On income, BJUN currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for PAPR.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of BJUN and PAPR you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

BJUNPAPR

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BJUN or PAPR?

BJUN has an expense ratio of 0.79% while PAPR charges 0.79%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, BJUN or PAPR?

Over the past year BJUN returned +9.66% vs +13.12% for PAPR, so PAPR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), BJUN annualized +9.62% vs +8.35% for PAPR. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BJUN or PAPR?

BJUN has been the more volatile fund at 10.1% annualized versus 7.1% for PAPR. Worst drawdown: BJUN -22.7% vs PAPR -15.3%.

Should I hold both BJUN and PAPR?

BJUN and PAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, BJUN or PAPR?

BJUN yields 0.00% while PAPR yields 0.00%, so PAPR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is PAPR better than BJUN?

BJUN led over 3Y and the full window, PAPR over 1Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.