BKCG vs QQQ
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, BKCG or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCG | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $123M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.59% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 30 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +9.20% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.91% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6%Best | 18.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -12.1%Best | -12.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,865 | $15,479Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.9% | 46.7%Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 31, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
BKCG vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
BKCG vs QQQ Performance
BNY Mellon Concentrated Growth ETF (BKCG) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BKCG returned +12.91% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, BKCG is up 9.20% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 12.6% for BKCG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.1% for BKCG and -12.6% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCG charges 0.50% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $18 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCG currently yields 0.59% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
53.9% of BKCG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 40.1% of QQQ's money is in holdings BKCG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in BKCG and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 30 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 84 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for BKCG (56.9% of the fund), and 17 for BKCG that do not appear in QQQ (41.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKCG | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.84% | 8.33% | 2.51% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.38% | 7.35% | 1.97% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.81% | 5.76% | 1.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.19% | 4.07% | 3.12% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 7.06% | 2.85% | 4.21% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.37% | 3.26% | 1.11% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.06% | 4.17% | 1.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.49% | 2.53% | 0.04% |
| ASML:ASASML HOLDING NV | 4.08% | 0.71% | 3.37% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 2.63% | 1.07% | 1.56% |
53.9% of BKCG is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCG or QQQ?
BKCG has an expense ratio of 0.50% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKCG or QQQ?
Over the past year BKCG returned +12.91% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKCG annualized +18.29% vs +33.81% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKCG or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 12.6% for BKCG. Worst drawdown: BKCG -12.1% vs QQQ -12.6%.
Should I hold both BKCG and QQQ?
BKCG and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCG and QQQ?
53.9% of BKCG's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 40.1% of QQQ's is in holdings BKCG also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in BKCG and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCG or QQQ?
BKCG yields 0.59% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so BKCG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than BKCG?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 57.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.