BKDV vs DVND
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF vs Touchstone Dividend Select ETF
Which is better, BKDV or DVND?
Nearly the same fund. DVND costs less.
DVND has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. DVND is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKDV | DVND |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $2.2B | $54M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.53% | 1.81% |
| Holdings | 84 | 112 |
| YTD Return | +17.11%Best | +11.56% |
| 1Y Return | +23.83%Best | +14.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.34% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8% | 11.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.5% | -14.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.9 years | $13,788Best | $12,814 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.5% | 28.8%Best |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Touchstone Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 1, 2024 | Aug 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 4, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.9 years).
BKDV vs DVND growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.
BKDV vs DVND Performance
BNY Mellon Dynamic Value ETF (BKDV) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Touchstone Dividend Select ETF (DVND) is an ETF from Touchstone Investments. Over the past year BKDV returned +23.83% while DVND returned +14.57%. Year to date, BKDV is up 17.11% versus a gain of 11.56% for DVND.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 11.0% for DVND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.5% for BKDV and -14.6% for DVND. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKDV charges 0.60% per year while DVND charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $50 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKDV currently yields 0.53% against 1.81% for DVND.
Holdings Overlap
37.8% of BKDV's money is in holdings DVND also owns. 36.7% of DVND's money is in holdings BKDV also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
18 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 56 in DVND, against full books of 84 and 112.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 38 positions for DVND that do not appear in our book for BKDV (63.3% of the fund), and 59 for BKDV that do not appear in DVND (60.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BKDV | Weight in DVND | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.98% | 5.29% | 0.31% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.02% | 1.74% | 4.28% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.28% | 3.10% | 0.18% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.03% | 1.74% | 2.29% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 2.74% | 1.98% | 0.76% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 2.21% | 2.00% | 0.21% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 2.65% | 1.54% | 1.11% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 1.76% | 2.11% | 0.35% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.79% | 2.56% | 1.77% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.57% | 1.66% | 0.09% |
37.8% of BKDV is already inside DVND.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKDV or DVND?
BKDV has an expense ratio of 0.60% while DVND charges 0.50%. DVND is the cheaper option, by $10 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BKDV or DVND?
Over the past year BKDV returned +23.83% vs +14.57% for DVND, so BKDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), BKDV annualized +18.42% vs +13.94% for DVND. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BKDV or DVND?
BKDV has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 11.0% for DVND. Worst drawdown: BKDV -15.5% vs DVND -14.6%.
Should I hold both BKDV and DVND?
BKDV and DVND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BKDV and DVND?
37.8% of BKDV's money is in holdings DVND also owns. 36.7% of DVND's is in holdings BKDV also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 79 positions we hold weights for in BKDV and 56 in DVND.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKDV or DVND?
BKDV yields 0.53% while DVND yields 1.81%, so DVND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DVND better than BKDV?
DVND has a lower expense ratio. BKDV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. DVND is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.